Receiving a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) is a critical moment in a Soldier’s career, signifying an alleged failure to comply with military standards or policies. As a formal reprimand issued by a General Officer, GOMORs not only document misconduct but also carry substantial consequences, potentially affecting one’s military career permanently if filed in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). It is crucial for Soldiers to understand the magnitude of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, often associated with misconduct such as inappropriate sexual relationships, sexual harassment, counterproductive leadership, and other violations.
Addressing a GOMOR requires a strategic approach, emphasizing the Soldier’s rights and the importance of crafting a comprehensive rebuttal. The rebuttal process allows for the presentation of evidence and arguments to contest the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand. Soldiers must familiarize themselves with regulations and AR 600-37 to navigate this complex landscape effectively. This guide aims to provide an overview for dealing with a GOMOR, from understanding its implications to exploring the avenues for appeal and removal, ensuring Soldiers are well-equipped to safeguard their careers.
A General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) is a formal administrative tool used within the Army to address misconduct or substandard performance by a Soldier. This document serves as a serious reprimand and can be filed either in the Soldier’s permanent file or locally. If filed locally, the GOMOR may be removed after the Soldier changes duty stations or after three years, whereas a permanently filed General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand remains in the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) and is visible to the Army Human Resources Command and promotion boards.
GOMORs are issued by General Officers and can be for various types of misconduct, including both military and civilian offenses. The letter details the alleged misconduct with supporting evidence, such as military or civilian police reports. It’s not a punishment, per se, but rather a document that records the facts of the misconduct, notifies the Soldier, and provides an opportunity to respond. However, it could result in ending a Soldier’s career.
The process and authority for issuing and managing GOMORs are governed by AR 600-37. Any General Officer has the authority to issue a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, regardless of the recipient’s unit, making it a powerful and widely applicable tool within the Army. Understanding the implications and the administrative nature is essential for all Army personnel, as it can significantly impact a Soldier’s career trajectory and opportunities within the military.
When confronted with a GOMOR, understanding the filing options is crucial for managing its impact on your military career. Commanders have two primary choices for filing: either in the performance section of the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) or locally within the Soldier’s current unit.
Upon receiving a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, Soldiers have specific rights and a critical opportunity to submit a formal rebuttal. This rebuttal is essential as it allows the individual to address the allegations and potentially influence the final filing.
When notified of a GOMOR, Soldiers are entitled to review all documentation that forms the basis of the reprimand. This right ensures transparency and provides the necessary context to formulate an effective response. Furthermore, each Soldier has a designated period, typically 7 to 10 days, to prepare and submit this rebuttal.
Given the potential career implications of a GOMOR, consulting with a military defense lawyer can be invaluable. These professionals can assist in understanding the nuances of military law, ensuring that your rebuttal is comprehensive and well-structured. Proper legal representation can significantly enhance the quality of your rebuttal, potentially leading to a more favorable outcome.
When faced with a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimandit’s crucial to understand the rights and the process of crafting an effective rebuttal. Upon receipt, Soldiers are granted a minimum of seven days to respond, with an extended period of 30 days for U.S. Army Reservists and Army National Guard members. The response should focus on denying the allegations or advocating for the reprimand to be filed in a local or restricted file.
A robust General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand rebuttal should directly address the facts presented in the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand and provide mitigating evidence. It is advisable to include:
The general officer will review the submitted materials in the GOMOR rebuttal, taking into account your response and the evidence provided. This review is crucial as it determines whether the it will be filed permanently, locally, or not at all. The cover memo, prepared with the assistance of your lawyer, plays a pivotal role in presenting your case effectively to the commanding officer. This document should articulate a compelling narrative that highlights your years of service, sacrifices, and contributions, aiming to sway the decision in your favor.
Each step in responding is critical and should be approached with thorough preparation and strategic planning, considering both immediate impacts and long-term career implications.
The Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) is the primary authority for appealing a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand. Soldiers can request the removal or transfer from their Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) if they believe it was improperly filed or if they have substantial evidence to challenge its validity. The appeal process is rigorous, requiring clear and convincing evidence to prove that the information is either untrue or unjust.
The DASEB reviews all submissions and makes a recommendation based on the evidence provided. If the board finds the appeal valid, the GOMOR may be removed, altered, or transferred to a restricted section of the AMHRR, which is less damaging to the soldier’s career. However, it’s important to note that the standard for removal is stringent, and not all appeals will result in the removal of the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand.
Through this article, we’ve navigated the complexities of receiving a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand and underscored the critical importance of understanding its implications on a Soldier’s career. The rights afforded to Soldiers, coupled with the strategic execution of a rebuttal, form the cornerstone of an effective defense against the potentially career-altering effects of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand. By highlighting the nuances of the rebuttal process and emphasizing what the rebuttal should focus on, we’ve laid out a roadmap for those seeking to mitigate the impact of such reprimands, emphasizing the pivotal role of an informed response in guarding against unfavorable outcomes.
As we conclude, it’s crucial for Soldiers facing a GOMOR to recognize not just the immediate implications but also the long-term repercussions of this formal reprimand on their military careers. Seeking professional guidance and crafting a well-thought-out rebuttal cannot be overstated in its importance. To navigate these challenging waters with the expertise and consideration your situation warrants, it’s advisable to schedule a consultation to discuss your particular General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand. This crucial step ensures that every individual is equipped with the necessary resources and support to address a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimandeffectively, striving for a resolution that best supports their career continuation and progression within the military framework.
Steven J. Goralski, with Military Defense Litigator, LLC, primary serves Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune and Fort Bragg. Serving these two locations allows service members in these two locations access to experienced, genuine and effective representation.
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, NC is home to II Marine Expeditionary Force. It is the largest Marine Corps Base on the East Coast. The location allows for amphibious training and its close proximity to two deep water ports allows rapid deployment worldwide.
Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, NC, by population is the largest military installation in the world with over 50,000 active duty service members. It also houses two airfields allowing quick deployment worldwide.
Available to represent service members throughout CONUS and world wide facing investigation and charges under the UCMJ.