In the realm of military discipline, Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) stands out as a crucial mechanism for maintaining order and discipline. Known as Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP), Article 15 allows commanders to address minor offenses committed by service members without resorting to a formal court-martial. The following text, from the Manual for Courts-Martial, provides a comprehensive look at the punishments under Article 15 UCMJ, reflecting the variances based on rank and authority, accompanied by a clear chart and informative video to guide you through the complexities of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment, under the UCMJ.
In the military justice system, Article 15 (NJP) Punishment stands as a critical component of maintaining discipline. Understanding Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is crucial for all service members as it outlines the non-judicial measures a commander can take to address minor offenses. The scope and implementation of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment vary significantly, often depending on the rank of the service member and the commanding officer.
When facing Article 15 (NJP) Punishment, service members are subject to a range of consequences, all defined under the umbrella of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment. These punishments are intended to correct and rehabilitate rather than serve as a judicial reckoning, hence the term non-judicial. However, the severity of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment can vary, including restrictions, extra duties, reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, or a combination thereof, each tailored to fit the specific infraction and the service member’s history.
In conclusion, commanders utilizing Article 15 (NJP) Punishment under the UCMJ have a responsibility to ensure that the punishments administered are proportional and fair. As such, understanding the limits and guidelines of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is a critical aspect of command training. Service members on the receiving end of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment also need to be aware of their rights and the possible implications of their actions.
Included with this discussion on Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is an easy-to-read chart detailing the maximum punishments permissible under Article 15 (NJP) Punishment, providing a quick reference. Additionally, to aid in the understanding of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment, a video explaining Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is provided, offering a comprehensive overview of this vital military discipline tool.
In conclusion, Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is a fundamental aspect of military law, crucial for upholding standards and discipline within the ranks. Whether you are a service member or a commanding officer, a thorough understanding of Article 15 (NJP) Punishment is essential for the fair and effective administration of military justice.
@militarylawyer Maximum Punishments at NJP / Article 15. #militarylawyer #military #fyp #fypシ #militarylife #militarytiktok #marines #army #navy #airforce #militarycommunity #ucmj
♬ original sound - Military Lawyer - S. Goralski
Article 15 (NJP) Punishment text from Manual for Courts-Martial
limit the power granted by Article 15 with respect to
the kind and amount of the punishment authorized.
Subject to paragraphs 1 and 4 of this Part and to
regulations of the Secretary concerned, the kinds and
amounts of punishment authorized by Article 15(b)
may be imposed upon Servicemembers as provided in
this paragraph.
in lieu of admonition or reprimand, the following
disciplinary punishments, subject to the limitation of
paragraph 5d of this Part, may be imposed upon
Servicemembers:
(1) Upon commissioned officers and warrant
officers—
(A) By any commanding officer—restriction to
specified limits, with or without suspension from duty
for not more than 30 consecutive days;
(B) If imposed by an officer exercising general
court-martial jurisdiction, an officer of general or flag
rank in command, or a principal assistant as defined in
paragraph 2c of this Part—
(i) arrest in quarters for not more than 30
consecutive days;
(ii) forfeiture of not more than one-half of one
month’s pay per month for 2 months;
(iii) restriction to specified limits, with or
without suspension from duty, for not more than 60
consecutive days;
(2) Upon other military personnel of the command—
(A) By any nonjudicial punishment authority—
(i) if imposed upon a person attached to or
embarked in a vessel, confinement for not more than 3
consecutive days;
(ii) correctional custody for not more than 7
consecutive days;
(iii) forfeiture of not more than 7 days’ pay;
(iv) reduction to the next inferior grade, if the
grade from which demoted is within the promotion
authority of the officer imposing the reduction or any
officer subordinate to the one who imposes the
reduction;
(v) extra duties, including fatigue or other
duties, for not more than 14 consecutive days;
(vi) restriction to specified limits with or
without suspension from duty, for not more than 14
consecutive days;
(B) If imposed by a commanding officer of the
grade of major or lieutenant commander or above or a
principal assistant as defined in paragraph 2c of this
Part—
(i) if imposed upon a person attached to or
embarked in a vessel, confinement for not more than 3
consecutive days;
(ii) correctional custody for not more than 30
consecutive days;
(iii) forfeiture of not more than one-half of 1
month’s pay per month for 2 months;
(iv) reduction to the lowest or any intermediate
pay grade, if the grade from which demoted is within
the promotion authority of the officer imposing the
reduction or any officer subordinate to the one who
imposes the reduction, but enlisted members in pay
grades above E-4 may not be reduced more than one
pay grade, except that during time of war or national
emergency this category of persons may be reduced
two grades if the Secretary concerned determines that
circumstances require the removal of this limitation;
(v) extra duties, including fatigue or other
duties, for not more than 45 consecutive days;
(vi) restrictions to specified limits, with or
without suspension from duty, for not more than 60
consecutive days.
(1) Admonition and reprimand. Admonition and
reprimand are two forms of censure intended to express
adverse reflection upon or criticism of a person’s
conduct. A reprimand is a more severe form of censure
than an admonition. When imposed as nonjudicial
punishment, the admonition or reprimand is considered
to be punitive, unlike the nonpunitive admonition and
reprimand provided for in paragraph 1g of this Part. In
the case of commissioned officers and warrant officers,
admonitions and reprimands given as nonjudicial
punishment must be administered in writing. In other
cases, unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary
concerned, they may be administered either orally or in
writing.
(2) Restriction. Restriction is the least severe form
of deprivation of liberty. Restriction involves moral
rather than physical restraint. The severity of this type
of restraint depends on its duration and the
geographical limits specified when the punishment is
imposed. A person undergoing restriction may be
required to report to a designated place at specified
times if reasonably necessary to ensure that the
punishment is being properly executed. Unless
otherwise specified by the nonjudicial punishment
authority, a person in restriction may be required to
perform any military duty.
(3) Arrest in quarters. As in the case of restriction,
the restraint involved in arrest in quarters is enforced
by a moral obligation rather than by physical means.
This punishment may be imposed only on officers. An
officer undergoing this punishment may be required to
perform those duties prescribed by the Secretary
concerned. However, an officer so punished is required
to remain within that officer’s quarters during the
period of punishment unless the limits of arrest are
otherwise extended by appropriate authority. The
quarters of an officer may consist of a military
residence, whether a tent, stateroom, or other quarters
assigned, or a private residence when government
quarters have not been provided.
(4) Correctional custody. Correctional custody is the
physical restraint of a person during duty or nonduty
hours, or both, imposed as a punishment under Article
15, and may include extra duties, fatigue duties, or hard
labor as an incident of correctional custody. A person
may be required to serve correctional custody in a
confinement facility, but, if practicable, not in
immediate association with persons awaiting trial or
held in confinement pursuant to trial by court-martial.
A person undergoing correctional custody may be
required to perform those regular military duties, extra
duties, fatigue duties, and hard labor which may be
assigned by the authority charged with the
administration of the punishment. The conditions
under which correctional custody is served shall be
prescribed by the Secretary concerned. In addition, the
Secretary concerned may limit the categories of
enlisted members upon whom correctional custody
may be imposed. The authority competent to order the
release of a person from correctional custody shall be
as designated by the Secretary concerned.
(5) Confinement. Confinement may be imposed
upon a person attached to or embarked on a vessel.
Confinement involves confinement for not more than
three consecutive days in places where the person so
confined may communicate only with authorized
personnel. The categories of enlisted personnel upon
whom this type of punishment may be imposed may be
limited by the Secretary concerned.
(6) Extra duties. Extra duties involve the
performance of duties in addition to those normally
assigned to the person undergoing the punishment.
Extra duties may include fatigue duties. Military duties
of any kind may be assigned as extra duty. However,
no extra duty may be imposed which constitutes a
known safety or health hazard to the member or which
constitutes cruel or unusual punishment or which is not
sanctioned by customs of the Service concerned. Extra
duties assigned as punishment of noncommissioned
officers, petty officers, or any other enlisted persons of
equivalent grades or positions designated by the
Secretary concerned, should not be of a kind which
demeans their grades or positions.
(7) Reduction in grade. Reduction in grade is one of
the most severe forms of nonjudicial punishment and it
should be used with discretion. As used in Article 15,
the phrase “if the grade from which demoted is within
the promotion authority of the officer imposing the
reduction or any officer subordinate to the one who
imposes the reduction,” does not refer to the authority
to promote the person concerned but to the general
authority to promote to the grade held by the person to
be punished.
(8) Forfeiture of pay. “Forfeiture” means a
permanent loss of entitlement to the pay forfeited.
“Pay,” as used with respect to forfeiture of pay under
Article 15, refers to the basic pay of the person or, in
the case of reserve component personnel on inactiveduty,
compensation for periods of inactive-duty
training, plus any sea or hardship duty pay. “Basic pay”
includes no element of pay other than the basic pay
fixed by statute for the grade and length of service of
the person concerned and does not include special pay
for a special qualification, incentive pay for the
performance of hazardous duties, proficiency pay,
subsistence and quarters allowances, and similar types
of compensation. If the punishment includes both
reduction, whether or not suspended, and forfeiture of
pay, the forfeiture must be based on the grade to which
reduced. The amount to be forfeited will be expressed
in whole dollar amounts only and not in a number of
day’s pay or fractions of monthly pay. If the forfeiture
is to be applied for more than 1 month, the amount to
be forfeited per month and the number of months
should be stated. Forfeiture of pay may not extend to
any pay accrued before the date of its imposition.
(1) Arrest in quarters may not be imposed in
combination with restriction;
(2) Confinement may not be imposed in combination
with correctional custody, extra duties, or restriction;
(3) Correctional custody may not be imposed in
combination with restriction or extra duties;
(4) Restriction and extra duties may be combined to
run concurrently, but the combination may not exceed
the maximum imposable for extra duties;
(5) Subject to the limits in subparagraphs 5d(1)
through (4) all authorized punishments may be
imposed in a single case in the maximum amounts.
e. Punishments imposed on reserve component
personnel while on inactive-duty training. When a
punishment under Article 15 amounting to a
deprivation of liberty (for example, restriction,
correctional custody, extra duties, or arrest in quarters)
is imposed on a member of a reserve component during
a period of inactive-duty training, the punishment may
be served during one or both of the following:
(1) A normal period of inactive-duty training; or
(2) A subsequent period of active duty (not including
a period of active duty under Article 2(d)(1), unless
such active duty was approved by the Secretary
concerned).
Unserved punishments may be carried over to
subsequent periods of inactive-duty training or active
duty. A sentence to forfeiture of pay may be collected
from active duty and inactive-duty training pay during
subsequent periods of duty.
f. Punishments imposed on reserve component
personnel when ordered to active duty for disciplinary
purposes. When a punishment under Article 15 is
imposed on a member of a reserve component during a
period of active duty to which the reservist was ordered
pursuant to R.C.M. 204 and which constitutes a
deprivation of liberty (for example, restriction,
correctional custody, extra duties, or arrest in quarters),
the punishment may be served during any or all of the
following:
(1) That period of active duty to which the reservist
was ordered pursuant to Article 2(d), but only where
the order to active duty was approved by the Secretary
concerned;
(2) A subsequent normal period of inactive-duty
training; or
(3) A subsequent period of active duty (not including
a period of active duty pursuant to R.C.M. 204 which
was not approved by the Secretary concerned).
Unserved punishments may be carried over to
subsequent periods of inactive-duty training or active
duty. A sentence to forfeiture of pay may be collected
from active duty and inactive-duty training pay during
subsequent periods of duty.
g. Effective date and execution of punishments.
Reduction and forfeiture of pay, if unsuspended, take
effect on the date the commander imposes the
punishments. Other punishments, if unsuspended, will
take effect and be carried into execution as prescribed
by the Secretary concerned.
Steven J. Goralski, with Military Defense Litigator, LLC, primary serves Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune and Fort Bragg. Serving these two locations allows service members in these two locations access to experienced, genuine and effective representation.
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, NC is home to II Marine Expeditionary Force. It is the largest Marine Corps Base on the East Coast. The location allows for amphibious training and its close proximity to two deep water ports allows rapid deployment worldwide.
Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, NC, by population is the largest military installation in the world with over 50,000 active duty service members. It also houses two airfields allowing quick deployment worldwide.
Available to represent service members throughout CONUS and world wide facing investigation and charges under the UCMJ.