When a Soldier leaves active service, the Army assigns a characterization of service that appears on their DD214 and reflects the Soldier’s overall duty performance and conduct. For enlisted Soldiers, the primary Army authority is Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations, which sets the standards for when Soldiers are separated and how their service is described.
At the Department of Defense level, DoDI 1332.14 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) establishes the baseline policy and procedures that apply across the Services for administrative separation of enlisted personnel, including how characterization decisions are made and when an entry-level (uncharacterized) description is required.
Army discharges generally fall into two categories: administrative characterizations (issued through command separation authority) and punitive discharges (imposed only as part of a court-martial sentence).
An Honorable discharge is the most favorable administrative characterization. AR 635-200 (Chapter 3) recognizes it as appropriate when the Soldier’s service generally meets Army standards of acceptable conduct and performance.
Similarly, DoDI 1332.14 describes honorable characterization as appropriate when the quality of the member’s service has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty.
A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge reflects service that was satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an Honorable discharge. Under AR 635-200 (Chapter 3), this characterization is still “under honorable conditions,” but is used when the Soldier’s record includes significant negative aspects that outweigh positive performance.
DoDI 1332.14 similarly authorizes a General characterization when the service has been honest and faithful, but negative aspects of the Soldier’s conduct or performance make an Honorable characterization inappropriate.
An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is the most severe characterization available through administrative separation. AR 635-200 authorizes this characterization in cases involving serious misconduct or conduct representing a significant departure from Army standards.
For VA benefits purposes, eligibility generally depends on whether the period of service is considered to have ended “under conditions other than dishonorable.” Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.12, the VA may conduct a Character of Discharge determination based on the facts and circumstances of the separation.
When a Soldier is separated very early in service during entry-level status, the discharge is often described as Uncharacterized rather than Honorable, General, or Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. DoDI 1332.14 explains that when an entry-level separation is required, the Soldier’s service is described as entry-level because a characterization is generally not appropriate at that stage.
A Bad Conduct Discharge is a punitive discharge, meaning it can only be imposed as part of an approved court-martial sentence. 32 C.F.R. § 724.111 defines a BCD as separation from the service under conditions other than honorable, and states it may only result from an approved general or special court-martial sentence.
A BCD is typically associated with serious offenses that warrant punishment beyond administrative separation, but that do not rise to the level normally requiring a dishonorable discharge. Because it results from a criminal conviction, a BCD often carries significant collateral consequences, including substantial limitations on VA benefits depending on VA review.
A Dishonorable Discharge is the most severe discharge characterization and can be imposed only by a general court-martial. 32 C.F.R. § 724.111 defines it as separation under dishonorable conditions and limits it to approved general court-martial sentences.
Because it represents the most severe form of military separation, a dishonorable discharge commonly results in the most significant legal and practical consequences, including major restrictions on eligibility for VA benefits under 38 C.F.R. § 3.12.
If you are a Soldier facing separation, you should consult with an experienced military attorney.
Steven J. Goralski, with Military Defense Litigator, LLC, primary serves Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune and Fort Bragg. Serving these two locations allows service members in these two locations access to experienced, genuine and effective representation.
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, NC is home to II Marine Expeditionary Force. It is the largest Marine Corps Base on the East Coast. The location allows for amphibious training and its close proximity to two deep water ports allows rapid deployment worldwide.
Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, NC, by population is the largest military installation in the world with over 50,000 active duty service members. It also houses two airfields allowing quick deployment worldwide.
Available to represent service members throughout CONUS and world wide facing investigation and charges under the UCMJ.